Still catching up on Four Lives episode 2? Read Steve’s review of episode 1 here.
Crime has always proven a popular subject for dramatists down the years, especially those working in television. Ever since the early days of the likes of Dixon of Dock Green and Z Cars, watching dogged detectives hunt down bad guys has enthralled and entertained audiences.
Why? Well, crime – and those fighting it – provides the perfect template for the classic ‘Good vs. Evil’ contrast. Countless stories have been told on the box using this recognisable framework… Criminals – bad. Police – good. It’s familiar and it’s reassuring, regardless of how true it is.
Four Lives, the BBC’s three-part drama about the four victims of Barking-based serial killer Stephen Port, turns the idea of law enforcement being inherently good on its head. Here, the police aren’t heroes. We’re not even entirely sure they all have good intentions. When we factor in that it’s very accurately based on real-life events that occurred in London only a few years ago, Jeff Pope and Neil McKay’s series suddenly presents itself as one of the most unsettling horrors shown on television in some time.
Monday evening’s first episode had us meet Stephen Port’s first two victims, albeit far too briefly, of course. Here, in this second of its three parts, Daniel Whitworth (Leo Flanagan) and Jack Taylor (Paddy Rowan) were introduced. We saw how heartlessly Port killed and dumped the former, even going on to falsify a suicide note in his own writing. He then left Daniel in the exact same spot as Gabriel, his second victim – all while preparing to go on trial for lying about the circumstances pertaining to Anthony Walgate’s murder.
Even the basic outline of what happened makes Barking and Dagenham Police sound incompetent. The wider truth, presented soberly here, is even more damning. Scenes from Walthamstow Coroner’s Court see a senior investigator at Anthony and Gabriel’s inquests forced to admit just how little police work was done during the investigations. The fact that at no point do police link any of the victims is genuinely shocking.
Sheridan Smith continues to impress, showing the heavy weight that losing a son in such a dreadful way can have. When we met her, Sharon Sak was smiley, bubbly and fun. Just a few short weeks later and she’s angry, desperate and lost. Her grief has her rejecting her husband, son and friends. Anthony’s murder – and her quest for the truth surrounding it – is destroying her, and it’s heartbreaking to watch.
As for Stephen Merchant’s Port, he continues to play him with ice in his long bones. Slow moving and almost puppet-like, his poky flat, stonewashed denim and preoccupation with collecting kids’ toys all unsettle. Ultimately, however, Merchant injects a sadness to the man. You don’t feel sorry for him, but he’s not presented as a cunning and innately scary boogeyman figure. Cleverly, the idea of the banality of evil is lent into here. And it works perfectly.
Viewers looking for thrills, spills and chills may be left disappointed by Four Lives. This isn’t a crime thriller, this is a serious look at the impact of bereavement and what happens when laziness, complacency and prejudice creeps into a police force.
Stephen Port may have taken four lives, but he ruined so many more. Wednesday evening’s third and final part will, at least, see Port receive his whole life sentence and show how, hopefully, the healing process began for some of the loved ones of Anthony Walgate, Gabriel Kovari, Daniel Whitworth and Jack Taylor.
Fantastic three parter. From the emotional journey with the victims families was done with clarity and sensitivity. And they had to become the detectives in the cases. Then you get the paid ones who were shockingly inept, embarrassing with a nod to homophonic undertones. Outrageous in very sense of the word!
Superb programme showing totally ineptitude police investigation. Things happening within small area not noted.Pretty outrageous. Some promoted. Unbelievable!.